Digital Engineering
Digital Transformation Web Development App Development Custom Software UI/UX Design SaaS Development
AI & Emerging Tech
Generative AI AR / VR / XR Game Development Blockchain & Web3 Data Analytics
Cloud & DevOps
Cloud Applications Cloud Migration DevOps & CI/CD Cybersecurity Cloud Maintenance
Salesforce & CRM
Salesforce Consulting Salesforce Development HubSpot CRM Microsoft Dynamics 365 CRM Integration & Migration
Specialized Services
Staff Augmentation Quality Assurance E-Commerce Art & Design Maintenance & Support Automation & Apps Explore our services
Gaming Banking & Fintech Healthcare & Pharma Retail & E-Commerce Education Technology Travel & Hospitality Real Estate Tech Logistics & Ops Energy & Utilities Telecom Startups Enterprises
Case Studies Blog
About RixlSoft Why RixlSoft Careers Contact Us
Contact Us
Case Study · Healthcare & Pharma

Clinic Network Automates Patient Intake and Claims Paperwork With Document AI

A US outpatient clinic network was drowning in faxed referrals, intake forms and insurance claims keyed in by hand. We built an AI document processing pipeline with human review on a HIPAA-conscious architecture, cutting manual data entry sharply while keeping staff in control of every uncertain decision.

ClientUS multi-site outpatient clinic network
RegionUnited States
Duration18 weeks
Team5 engineers
Clinic Network Automates Patient Intake and Claims Paperwork With Document AI
Healthcare & PharmaMarch 2026
70%
Less manual data entry for intake staff
4 hrs
Referral turnaround, down from two days
98.5%
Field accuracy after human review
40%
Fewer claims rejected for missing data
The Challenge

What stood in the way

Across its clinics, front-desk and billing staff processed thousands of documents a week: faxed referrals, scanned insurance cards, handwritten intake forms and claim attachments. Everything was re-typed into the practice management system. Backlogs meant patients waited days for appointments after a referral, and typos in member IDs and procedure codes were a leading cause of rejected claims and slow reimbursement.

Leadership was open to AI but wary. Any solution had to protect patient data, avoid silently wrong entries in medical records, and fit into the tools staff already used. Front-desk teams had seen earlier software rollouts add clicks rather than remove them, so adoption would depend on the system visibly saving time from the first week.

Our Solution

How we solved it

We designed a human-in-the-loop pipeline rather than full automation. AI classifies each document and extracts the fields that matter, but every extraction carries a confidence score, and anything uncertain or clinically sensitive goes to a reviewer with the source image beside it. The system learns from corrections, and all processing stays inside a locked-down cloud environment covered by business associate agreements.

01

Classification and extraction

OCR and layout models combined with a large language model classify referrals, intake forms, insurance cards and claim attachments, then extract structured fields such as member IDs, diagnoses and procedure codes.

02

Confidence-based human review

A review queue shows low-confidence fields highlighted on the original document. Staff confirm or correct in seconds, and corrections feed a weekly evaluation and tuning cycle.

03

Validation before submission

Extracted data is checked against payer rules, eligibility responses and code sets before it reaches the practice management system, catching errors that previously caused claim rejections.

04

HIPAA-conscious cloud architecture

Private networking, encryption in transit and at rest, BAA-covered AI services, minimum-necessary data access, full audit trails and no patient data used to train third-party models.

Delivery

How the Project Unfolded

01
Weeks 1-3

Document audit and risk review

Sampled document types and volumes across clinics, mapped current workflows, and completed a data flow and security review with the compliance lead.

02
Weeks 4-9

Pipeline and review interface

Built ingestion from fax lines and scanners, classification and extraction models, and the reviewer interface, all tested on de-identified historical documents.

03
Weeks 10-14

Pilot at two clinics

Ran the system alongside existing processes at two sites, measured accuracy per field, and tuned confidence thresholds with front-desk and billing staff.

04
Weeks 15-18

Integration and network rollout

Connected validated output to the practice management system, rolled out clinic by clinic, and set up monitoring, audit reporting and staff training.

The Outcome

Results that mattered

Intake and billing teams now spend about 70% less time on manual data entry, and referrals are typically processed within four hours instead of up to two days. With human review on uncertain fields, accuracy reaches 98.5%, and claims rejected for missing or incorrect data fell by around 40%, improving cash flow across the network.

Staff time has shifted from typing to patient-facing work. The compliance team has a complete audit trail for every document, and the network is now extending the same pipeline to prior authorizations and records requests, reusing the review workflow and security controls already approved by its compliance team.

Human review on every low-confidence field
Referral turnaround cut from two days to hours
BAA-covered services with full audit trails
No patient data used for model training

Have a similar challenge?

Book a free discovery call. We will map your goals and show you how we would approach it — no obligation.

Talk to an Expert
Get In Touch

Let's Build Something Extraordinary

Tell us about your project — whether it's an AI system, a game, an AR experience, or a complete platform. We'll schedule a free discovery call and show you exactly what's possible.

Send the form — it comes straight to our team
Remote-first · Global availability
Response within 24 hours
Free initial consultation

We'll reply within 24 hours. Your details are never shared.